Skip to main content

Speed Read

I'm now 355 pages into Deathly Hallows, but I'm still nowhere near finishing this book. Devoting about 2-3 hours a day reading it, I can't help but think about the people who have been able to read all 700+ pages in a matter of hours. How in the world can people read so fast and remember what they read?

For me, when I read, I try to imagine what I'm seeing. Rowling has a wonderful way of explaining the world of Harry Potter and I want to be fully engulfed in that world. I try to read every word, but tend to skip over a few words here and there describing people's reactions to dialogue (ie, "Ron twitched" and "Harry sighed"). Not only that, but I'm trying to remember six books worth of material as I read this one. Rowling skillfully reminds the reader what's what without insulting those who have read the previous books over and over again. Still, there's a lot of information flying around my head.

I remember a few years ago hearing from a friend that he read The Sorcerer's Stone in one night. I found that to be an incredible feat; he thought it was just an easy read. Not me: it took me a couple of weeks to read the whole thing. I argue I'm reading and processing the whole thing at the same time. It takes me a while.

So, for you readers, can you read a book at a brisk pace and remember what you read?

Comments

Ted said…
I've learned to read very quickly and retain what I've read. This took a long time to learn because I was a pretty slow reader for a long time.

However, my daughter and I are reading Deathly Hallows, but are taking our time. Plus, we're reading to each other out loud, so that generally slows things down -- but in a good way! :-)
stevie said…
I'm a very fast reader with a good memory, so that's my story. For the most part, I read fiction very, very quickly. (I read "Twilight" by Stephenie Meyer the same week as Deathly Hallows, for example.) Even stuff that's literary and dense, with few exceptions, I tend to tear through quickly. I read "Atonement" by Ian McEwan and "Never Let Me Go" by Kazuo Ishiguro in a week.

Nonfiction takes me longer, for some reason, as does very long, dense books for adults. Jonathan Strange took me about four months, but I was only reading about a chapter a night. Maybe it's things with footnotes that take me longer.
jen said…
i'm with stevie. i read the first 3 harry potter books in less than a week and retained the bulk of what i read. it's just how i've been since i was young.

personally, i've noticed that, especially with fiction, i visualized while i read, so that even though things may be altered as i progress through a book, everything falls into place quite easily. of course it's also why i have a problem with a lot of books-to-movie adaptations -- things just don't look the way i thought they would...
Kev said…
I read all of Hallows in a very long Saturday this past weekend, and, while I couldn't recite it to you verbatim, I'm pretty sure I remember the gist of everything. It helps that I've been reading since the age of three, I think. I tore through the first four Potter books in about a week and a half, if I recall.

Popular posts from this blog

Go Where You Wanna Go

It's been a year since I moved away from Lakewood, and even though I could relocate to a new place as a newly-single guy, I've chosen to stay where I am. I enjoy living in North Dallas/Richardson given its central location, being not too far away from places I have enjoyed going to in my fourteen-plus years living in Dallas County. Living in Lakewood for nine years was critical for me, but I am glad I don't have homeless people going through my garbage, my street getting shut down like it's Mardi Gras on Halloween night, and I don't have to answer to the not-so-friendly landlords who bought my old place. I have a new housemate moving in at the end of the month and I have many reasons to be excited as he's been a friend for many years. Couple that with a humongous  new record store opening in nearby Farmers Branch , shows to see, and a quick trip to Los Angeles for something very cool (for which I reveal at a later date) and I'm happy to say fall is sha...

The Complete Idiot's Guide to Catherine Wheel

Originally posted: Tuesday, August 29th, 2006 Despite managing to release five proper albums, Catherine Wheel was one of those bands that always seemed to slip past the mainstream rock crowd. Yes, they got some nice airplay in their day, but people seem to have forgotten about them. You may hear “Black Metallic” or “Waydown” on a “classic alternative” show on Sirius or XM or maybe even on terrestrial radio, but that’s about it. For me, they were one of most consistent rock bands of the ’90s, meandering through shoegazer, hard rock, space rock and pop rock, all while eluding mainstream pigeonholing. Led by the smooth, warm pipes of vocalist/guitarist Rob Dickinson (cousin of Iron Maiden’s Bruce Dickinson), Catherine Wheel featured Brian Futter on lead guitar, Dave Hawes on bass and Neil Sims on drums. They weren’t a pretty-boy guitar band, but they weren’t a scuzzy bunch of ragamuffins either. Though the band hailed from England, Catherine Wheel found itself more welcome on American air...

Socials

 Hey, everyone! You can find me on several other platforms: http:/ http:// themeparkexperience.substack.com http:// Instagram.com/ericjgrubbs http:// TikTok.com/@ericjgrubbs http:// threads.net/ericjgrubbs http:// ericjgrubbs.bsky.social Thanks!